I’m chatting with my creative director during our monthly 1:1.
We’re talking shop at this point.
“A lot of brands use display ads for direct response,” I say. “But I think brand awareness is a better approach.”
“Honestly, have you ever clicked on a big box before? To actually take advantage of the offer, I mean, not because you’re a curious marketer.”
I don’t wait for an answer.
“Think about it. Unless you have a super juicy offer for a super primed audience, click-through rates for display ads are…super low.”
“That doesn’t necessarily mean they’re ineffective, I just think they can be optimized for awareness.”
“Why not treat them like the internet’s version of out-of-home?”
“The best billboards,” I explain, “are designed to leave a lasting impression rather than produce an immediate response.”
I glance at the clock. We’re already over time.
“Obviously, different advertising goals require different creative and messaging,” I admit.
“But if more brands focused on making their display ads memorable, I think they’d be more effective in the long run.”
He leans back and nods.
“It’s definitely worth testing.”
Worth testing, indeed.
~
Hey, I’m Cory, owner of Cory B.D. Copy & Consulting. I offer strategic thinking and copywriting for businesses that put craft (and the human) first.
Want words that make people feel something? Or a messaging strategy that you can actually use?
My calendar is now open.


The argument that brand awareness suits display better than direct response is worth taking seriously, since display rarely gets credit for conversion anyway. Keeping it to 193 words makes it easy to actually read. I would be interested in how you would measure it.
LikeLike